Subject	I differ. I have driven both and RS-R spring are
Posted by	Spongerider :) on February 15, 2006 at 3:11 PM
	This message has been viewed 42 times.
In Reply To	The RS*R drop is similar to Eibach, the primary difference posted by YugoBernie (NoVA) on February 15, 2006 at 02:44 PM
Message	a better match for daily and performance driving. www.SoCalZCrew.com **Dynoed at 371.2 rwhp. and 362.3 rwtrq. @ .9 bar on pumped 91 gas no time tweaking 3/11/03** **Dynoed at 411 rwhp. and 452 rwtq. @1.15 kg. on race gas 104 no time tweaking 3/28/03 **All numbers are SAE corrected**
Follow Ups	suggestions - dondon 12:49:34 02/15/06 Eibach (n/m) - dmv300z 12:50:34 02/15/06 Eibach (n/m) - Kenny 12:58:03 02/15/06 Eibach or RS*R... - BradZ (FL) 13:08:42 02/15/06 He's driving on the street. - Kenny 13:21:31 02/15/06 Megan Racing... - Irocsx2002 13:12:18 02/15/06 junk (n/m) - red300zxtt 13:50:00 02/15/06 why junk (n/m) - Drk93TT 14:33:47 02/15/06 if you dont know, dont post (n/m) - AxleZTTic 19:07:37 02/15/06 You have a few choices - ZXRider(SoCal) 14:33:30 02/15/06 And oh yes. Eibach is the best bang for the buck =) (n/m) - ZXRider(SoCal) 14:38:05 02/15/06 The RS*R drop is similar to Eibach, the primary difference - YugoBernie (NoVA) 14:44:53 02/15/06 Yep...I was about to mention that... - BradZ (FL) 14:49:55 02/15/06 I differ. I have driven both and RS-R spring are - Spongerider :) 15:11:32 02/15/06 not necessarily. - Spee 18:05:59 02/15/06 I have Eibachs on my 2+2. It's not bad, but I suggest RS*R. - Z U N L 16:39:43 02/15/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.